Today, the combined economic potential of the OTS countries exceeds $2.1 trillion. In 2025, the economies of these countries grew by 6.8 percent. Uzbekistan’s trade turnover with OTS countries reached $10.8 billion in 2025.

These figures demonstrate the significant potential for economic cooperation across the Turkic world.

Turning Economic Initiatives into Practical Mechanisms

A key aspect of Uzbekistan’s approach within the OTS is its focus on strengthening economic cooperation through concrete mechanisms and projects. Currently, practical cooperation is being carried out in more than 35 areas within the Organization. Uzbekistan has also put forward the idea of creating a “Space of New Economic Opportunities” in the near future, bringing together favorable conditions for trade, business, and mutual investment, as well as the necessary legal framework and infrastructure.

The President of the Republic of Uzbekistan has also proposed establishing a Permanent Council on Economic Partnership of the Turkic States and locating its Project Office in Tashkent. Such a mechanism could help move from discussing economic initiatives to their systematic preparation and implementation.

Another important initiative put forward by Uzbekistan is the establishment of a Turkic States Industrial Alliance. Cooperation in such sectors as mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, mining, petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, textiles, food processing, and construction materials could enable the formation of new production chains across the OTS region. In this regard, a cooperation model based on the principle of “raw materials – processing – science and technology – finished products” is of particular importance.

For Uzbekistan, this model could, on the one hand, facilitate the integration of domestic producers into major regional value chains and, on the other, support the production of higher value-added goods and the expansion of export destinations.

Transport Connectivity as the Economic Foundation of Integration

Uzbekistan’s geographical location makes transport connectivity a strategically important area of economic integration within the OTS. As a landlocked country, the development of new transport corridors is one of the key factors determining the competitiveness of Uzbekistan’s foreign trade.

In this regard, the development of the Middle Corridor and its connection with the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway currently under construction could create new economic opportunities. In the future, connecting this system with the Trans-Afghan Corridor could further strengthen Central Asia’s potential to become a major transport hub linking the markets of East Asia, South Asia, the Caucasus, Türkiye, and Europe.

New Financial Infrastructure

Deepening economic integration also requires institutions capable of financing it. In this regard, the establishment of the Turkic Investment Fund has marked a new stage in cooperation within the OTS. The Fund is focused on developing trade and economic cooperation, financing joint projects, and supporting small and medium-sized enterprises.

The launch of the Fund’s operational activities in 2026, along with the establishment of the OTS Council of Central Bank Governors and the Turkic Council for Green Finance, demonstrates that the financial infrastructure of a common economic space is gradually taking shape.

Uzbekistan supports efforts to combine the resources of the Turkic Investment Fund with those of other international financial institutions. In particular, it has proposed establishing strategic cooperation between the Fund and the Islamic Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, as well as other international and national financial institutions.

Such an approach could enable the OTS to combine its own financial resources with international capital and expand opportunities for financing large-scale infrastructure, industrial, energy, and green projects.

Digital Economy – A New Frontier of Integration

The next major growth area for economic integration among the Turkic states is linked to the digital economy and artificial intelligence.

At the informal OTS summit held in Turkistan in 2026, Uzbekistan proposed establishing a strategic cooperation network in the field of artificial intelligence and developing a “Digital Turkic Corridor Concept”. The concept is aimed at interconnecting data centers across the region through high-speed communication networks, developing a unified modern digital space, and creating a new market for technology-based services.

This initiative is particularly important for Uzbekistan. The country’s geographical position in Central Asia could strengthen its future role not only as a transport hub, but also as a center for digital transit and data exchange.

Green Economy and New Markets

New sources of growth for the Turkic states are not limited to traditional industries. Renewable energy, green hydrogen and ammonia, critical minerals, organic agriculture, and environmental technologies are emerging as promising areas of cooperation.

The “Green Transformation” Consortium proposed by Uzbekistan is aimed at jointly implementing green energy projects, attracting technologies and standards, and expanding the use of public-private partnership mechanisms. In the area of critical minerals, the focus is shifting from exporting raw materials toward their deep processing and the production of higher value-added goods.

The significant agricultural potential of the OTS countries, their diverse climate zones, and proximity to major consumer markets create opportunities for establishing new cooperation chains in the production and export of organic products. In this area, Uzbekistan has proposed combining scientific research, breeding, production, and logistics capabilities and, in the future, bringing products to global markets under a common brand.

A New Stage – New Opportunities

Today, economic cooperation within the Organization of Turkic States is moving to a qualitatively new stage. Alongside increasing trade volumes, industrial cooperation, mutual investment, transport and digital connectivity, energy, and new financial mechanisms are becoming key areas of the common economic agenda.

This creates broad opportunities for making more effective use of the potential available across the OTS region and developing new sources of economic growth.

In recent years, cooperation between Central Asia and Azerbaijan in the energy sector has entered an entirely new phase. This progress is primarily the result of the wise policies pursued by the countries’ leaders, based on mutual trust, friendship, and good-neighborly relations. Thanks to this strong political will, major energy initiatives that were once viewed only as future prospects have now moved into the implementation stage, becoming important projects serving Central Asia’s sustainable development and contributing to the global green transformation.

Today, Central Asia is no longer a field of competition in the energy sector; rather, it is increasingly becoming a space for cooperation based on mutual trust, shared interests, and the principles of sustainable development. This process is gaining practical significance thanks to the forward-looking policies, open dialogue, and constructive approach of the countries’ leaders.

Energy security, the rational use of water and energy resources, coordination of electricity systems, and the rapid development of renewable energy sources have become key priorities of regional cooperation. The emerging regional architecture is creating new opportunities not only for meeting domestic demand but also for participation in international energy markets.

The countries of Central Asia have established mechanisms for continuous dialogue in the fields of energy and water management. Regular working meetings among the ministries of energy and water resources of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan play an important role in ensuring the stable operation of electricity systems, the efficient use of water resources, the coordination of seasonal loads, and the uninterrupted supply of energy to households and industry.

Within this framework, the strategic partnership between Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan occupies a special place. The national energy systems of the two countries are closely interconnected, and practical cooperation in coordinating electricity flows, maintaining capacity balances, and ensuring the reliable operation of the unified energy system continues to develop steadily. Regular dialogue at the level of heads of state has further strengthened this cooperation and transformed it into an important integration factor for the entire region.

The countries’ goals in the field of renewable energy are also closely aligned. In recent years, Uzbekistan has accelerated the development of green energy, implementing large-scale programs to build solar and wind power plants, energy storage systems, and modern electricity networks. Kazakhstan is likewise consistently advancing reforms aimed at developing a green economy and reducing carbon emissions. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, with their substantial hydropower potential, make a significant contribution to regional energy security. Meanwhile, Turkmenistan is implementing important initiatives to modernize its energy infrastructure and expand electricity exports.

Today, the common objective of the Central Asian countries extends beyond the development of their national energy systems. The primary task is to establish a single regional energy space that is interconnected, competitive, environmentally sustainable, and open to external markets. In this context, Azerbaijan’s participation broadens the geographic scope of cooperation and creates a strategic corridor linking Central Asia with Europe.

The Green Corridor: A Strategic Bridge Linking
Central  Asia and Europe

The high level of political trust achieved among the Central Asian countries is now being translated into practice through major transnational energy projects. Among the most significant is the Green Corridor initiative, being implemented by Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan.

This project will elevate regional energy cooperation to an entirely new level by connecting Central Asia to the European energy system through the Caspian Sea. It will create opportunities to export environmentally friendly electricity generated in the region to international markets.

The strategic partnership agreement signed in Baku during COP29 in November 2024 provided a solid legal foundation for this initiative. Subsequently, cooperation among national electricity grid operators was established, and the Green Corridor Alliance LLC was created. Currently, the Italian company CESI is conducting the project’s feasibility study.

The Green Corridor is not merely an export route; it is a strategic platform for creating an integrated electricity market in Central Asia. The project will strengthen interconnections among national power systems, facilitate more efficient use of renewable energy resources, and create new opportunities for attracting investment.

This initiative is a practical expression of the strategic partnership between Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan and will help transform Central Asia into an important link in the global green energy value chain.

Kambarata HPP-1: A Project for Regional Energy Security

Another important example of energy integration in Central Asia is the construction of Kambarata HPP-1.

Thanks to the political support of the Presidents of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, as well as the coordinated efforts of the governments of the three countries, this project has finally moved from decades of discussion to practical implementation.

With a planned capacity of 1,880 MW, the hydropower plant is not merely a major energy facility. It will contribute to maintaining the water-energy balance in Central Asia, improving the reliability of electricity supply, managing seasonal demand more effectively, and ensuring the rational use of water resources in the context of climate change.

The project will also bring new investment, modern infrastructure, and thousands of jobs to the economies of the three participating countries. The involvement of the World Bank further confirms the project’s international significance and economic viability.

Central Asia: A New Global Hub for Green Energy

Today, the countries of Central Asia are demonstrating an entirely new model of development in the energy sector. Competition is being replaced by trusted cooperation, while rivalry over resources is giving way to integration based on shared interests.

Regular dialogue among Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan is helping to ensure the stable functioning of the unified energy system, coordinate water and energy resources, and improve mechanisms for mutual support in emergency situations.

At the same time, the large-scale reforms being implemented by Uzbekistan in the development of renewable energy have become an important driver of the region’s transition to a green economy. The rapid construction of solar and wind power plants, energy storage facilities, and modern electricity grids is significantly increasing Central Asia’s overall energy potential.

Today, the countries of the region are pursuing a long-term strategy aimed not only at meeting domestic energy demand but also at supplying environmentally friendly electricity to Europe and other international markets.

In conclusion, the strategic partnership in the energy sector between Central Asia and Azerbaijan is a practical result of the policies pursued by the countries’ leaders, which are based on mutual trust, friendship, and good-neighborly relations.

Major initiatives such as the Green Corridor and Kambarata HPP-1 clearly demonstrate that the countries of the region are capable of jointly addressing complex challenges. This cooperation not only strengthens energy security but also lays a solid foundation for transforming Central Asia into a strategic green energy hub connecting Europe and Asia.

The first session of the Fergana Peace Forum, titled “Fergana Valley: Uniting Efforts for Peace and Progress” is scheduled for October 15–16, 2025, in the city of Fergana.

Next week, the city of Fergana will transform into a focal point for international dialogue and cooperation, hosting key stakeholders from across the region and beyond. This gathering underscores the city’s growing importance as a center for promoting peace, mutual understanding, and collaborative development in Central Asia.

The Forum will be organized by the Institute for Strategic and Interregional Studies under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan (ISRI), jointly with the Center for Progressive Reforms, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), and the Peacebuilding Hub — a platform that brings together reputable international organizations specializing in peacebuilding and social cohesion.

Entitled “Fergana Valley: Uniting Efforts for Peace and Progress” the Forum is organized in partnership with the National Institute for Strategic Initiatives under the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Center for Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan, and Institute of studying of the problems of Asian and European countries of the National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan.

The two-day forum will bring together over 300 participants from Central Asian countries, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as well as from Asia, Europe, and the Americas.

Among the high-level guests are Head of the UNRCCA Kaha Imnadze, European Union Special Representative for Central Asia Eduards Stiprais, Director of the OSCE Conflict Prevention Centre Kate Fearon, Secretary-General of CICA Kairat Sarybay and Deputy Secretary-General of the SCO Sohail Khan.

A key feature of the upcoming session will be its inclusive nature, with participation from representatives of civil society, youth organizations, women’s associations, as well as expert and academic communities.

Leading international peacebuilding institutions such as Berghof Foundation (Germany), the Martti Ahtisaari Peace Foundation (Finland), the PeaceNexus Foundation (Switzerland), and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) will also be at the Forum. Reflecting a commitment to be inclusive, the Forum will also draw participation from youth, women groups and the academia circle. 

The Forum aims to create a standing platform for promoting dialogue, mutual trust, good-neighborly relations, and for developing a shared strategy for the development of the Fergana Valley.

The forum’s agenda includes discussions on ensuring stability and sustainable development in the Fergana Valley, unlocking its economic potential, strengthening cultural and humanitarian ties, and expanding the roles of the private sector, youth, and civil society.

The Forum will see the first observation of the “Yntymak Day” (“Day of Unity”) which celebrates the unity in diversity spirit of communities in Fergana Valley. 

Among the anticipated outcomes of the forum is the adoption of a Communiqué calling for the establishment of a unified space of friendship, good-neighborliness, and sustainable development in the Fergana Valley.

At the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, the President of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, underlined that “the era of closed borders, unresolved disputes and conflicts in Central Asia has receded into the past. In recent years, the volume of mutual trade, investment and transport flows in our region has increased fivefold. Joint investment funds, cross-border trade and industrial cooperation zones are being established, while major infrastructure projects are under implementation”.

The President of Uzbekistan emphasized that “today marks the beginning of the formation of a New Central Asia. Thanks to its unity, stability, and growing regional identity, it is securing an increasingly strong position as an independent actor in the system of international relations”.

“Peace in Fergana Valley has been made possible by strong commitments in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and by the diverse communities who have transformed differences into strength. The First Peace Forum on Fergana Valley will showcase how this political resolve and communities’ bond could usher peace,” said Eldor Aripov, Director of ISRS.   

According to him, “The Ferghana Forum is intended to create a new image of the Ferghana Valley as a space of peace, harmony, and opportunity,” demonstrating that the political will of the countries’ leaders and the unity of their peoples can ensure stability and prosperity in the region”.

Dunyo IA

1. Introduction

Central and South Asia form one of Eurasia’s most significant geographic junctions. Central Asia connects the continent’s east–west and north–south routes, while South Asia contains one of the world’s largest population bases and consumer markets. Taken together, the countries of the two subregions have a population of more than 2 billion people; however, their direct economic interaction remains below its potential level.

The scale of the potential market is confirmed by the figures: in 2024, the population of South Asia was approximately 1.68 billion people, while the region’s combined GDP was about US$4.5 trillion. At the same time, the economy of the five Central Asian countries in 2024 amounted to approximately US$489 billion. However, the level of interregional integration remains low: even within South Asia, intraregional trade is estimated at around 5% of total trade turnover, which is significantly lower than the ASEAN figure^[1][2][3].

This is evident in trade statistics: Central Asia’s main trade flows continue to be oriented toward Russia, China, the European Union, Türkiye, and the Middle East, while trade with South Asia occupies a comparatively limited niche.

The underused potential is explained not by a lack of demand, but by structural constraints. Between the two subregions, there are mountain barriers, complex cross-border routes, differing levels of integration into international supply chains, non-uniform customs and technical procedures, as well as the Afghanistan factor, which is simultaneously the shortest connecting link and the most sensitive element of the regional architecture. Therefore, the issue of connectivity has not only commercial but also strategic significance.

The restoration of economic ties between Central and South Asia should not be viewed as a romanticized return to historical routes. In modern conditions, it is a matter of competitiveness, supply-chain security, energy resilience, and diversification of foreign economic directions. For the countries of Central Asia, the southern route opens shorter access to the ports of the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean. For the countries of South Asia, it creates an opportunity to gain access to energy resources, food products, industrial goods, and new markets in Eurasia.

Uzbekistan occupies a special place in this logic. It is located in the central part of the region, borders all Central Asian states and Afghanistan, and therefore is capable of forming a link between the internal markets of Central Asia and the southern direction. At the same time, the role of a connector state means more than the transit of goods. It includes the coordination of infrastructure projects, the development of logistics services, the improvement of institutional quality, the creation of an analytical basis for decision-making, and the involvement of the private sector in interregional projects.

2. Historical and geographical preconditions for connectivity

The historical connection between Central and South Asia was formed long before the emergence of modern state borders. The cities of Transoxiana, Khorasan, Bactria, and northern India were part of a network of caravan routes and exchanges of artisanal goods, knowledge, religious traditions, and financial practices. Samarkand, Bukhara, Balkh, Merv, Kabul, Peshawar, and Lahore, in different periods, served as trade and cultural hubs linking the Eurasian space.

However, historical connectedness does not automatically translate into economic integration today. Modern supply chains depend on railways, highways, ports, energy networks, digital cargo-tracking systems, insurance, banking settlements, and predictable rules. Where even one of these elements is absent, transit becomes expensive, slow, and risky.

The geography of the region creates both incentives and constraints. On the one hand, the distance from Uzbekistan’s southern borders to northern Afghanistan is relatively short, and the route through Afghanistan is potentially the shortest overland path from Central Asia to Pakistan and onward to the ports of the Indian Ocean. On the other hand, mountain ranges, differences in railway gauge, the limited capacity of border infrastructure, security issues, and insufficient standardization of procedures increase the cost of projects.

Uzbekistan’s geographical role has not only qualitative but also measurable significance: the country is one of only two double-landlocked states in the world and, at the same time, the only state bordering all four other Central Asian countries as well as Afghanistan. In this context, the Mazar-i-Sharif–Kabul–Peshawar railway project, with a length of approximately 573 km, acquires systemic importance, since it could reduce the time and cost of transportation toward Pakistan’s ports by roughly 30%^[4].

Therefore, connectivity should be understood more broadly than the physical connection of two points on a map. In the modern economy, it includes four dimensions. The first is infrastructural: roads, railways, terminals, ports, and energy networks. The second is institutional: customs, tariffs, standards, sanitary and phytosanitary rules, permits, and transit guarantees. The third is commercial: demand, purchasing power, contracts, logistics companies, insurance, and banking channels. The fourth is social and humanitarian: education, labor skills, tourism, medical ties, and research cooperation.

This approach helps avoid oversimplification. Even the shortest road will not become a sustainable corridor unless it is supported by a reliable legal environment, competitive tariffs, financial guarantees, and coordination among states.

3. Current state of trade and economic cooperation

Trade and economic ties between Central and South Asia are developing, but their scale still does not correspond to the size of the markets. Trade between Central Asian countries and India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan remains relatively modest compared with their trade with China, Russia, the European Union, Türkiye, and countries of the Middle East.

Central Asia supplies, or could potentially expand supplies to South Asia, in such areas as agricultural products, grain, fruit and vegetable products, textiles, fertilizers, energy goods, certain types of metals, and industrial raw materials. South Asia, primarily India and Pakistan, holds competitive positions in pharmaceuticals, medical goods, IT services, equipment, textile products, processed food products, and consumer goods.

In recent years, Uzbekistan has been strengthening the southern direction of its foreign economic policy. Trade ties with India and Pakistan are developing through pharmaceuticals, textiles, food products, services, logistics, and investment projects. Uzbekistan’s foreign trade in the southern direction is already growing, but it still occupies a limited place in the overall structure of foreign trade. The largest trade flows with South Asian countries are with Afghanistan and India. However, the very fact that certain bilateral flows are growing does not solve the main problem: interregional trade remains fragmented. In order to turn it into a sustainable market, it is necessary to reduce transaction costs, ensure the predictability of transit, make standards comparable, and develop business services.

The issue of trade data is especially important. Mutual trade is often assessed using different sources, while the statistics of exporting countries and importing countries may diverge. To develop effective policy, a regularly updated data panel is needed, broken down by corridors, types of cargo, border-crossing times, transportation costs, return loads, the number of permits, and the actual use of preferential regimes. Without such a database, regional initiatives risk remaining merely declaratory.

4. Transport and logistics infrastructure as the basis of connectivity

Transport infrastructure is the material foundation for the rapprochement of Central and South Asia. At the same time, it is more accurate to speak not of a single route, but of a portfolio of corridors. Relying on only one route increases the vulnerability of the entire system. A diversified network of routes through Afghanistan, Iran, the Caspian Sea, the Caucasus, and existing Eurasian directions creates redundancy, reduces risks, and strengthens the negotiating position of shippers.

The key project in the southern direction remains the trans-Afghan railway corridor Mazar-i-Sharif–Kabul–Peshawar. Its strategic value lies in its potential to connect Uzbekistan and other Central Asian countries with Pakistan’s ports, including Karachi, Qasim, and Gwadar. If implemented, such a corridor could reduce the distance and delivery time for certain types of cargo. However, the project requires the resolution of several complex issues: financing, security, technical parameters, railway gauge compatibility, the operating model, tariffs, and the distribution of risks among participants.

The Termez–Hairatan hub in Uzbekistan has particular significance. It is the closest entry point from Uzbekistan into Afghanistan and is already used as a logistics, humanitarian, and trade channel. The development of terminals, warehouses, customs capacities, multimodal transport services, and digital cargo-control systems could turn this hub into a stable anchor point for interregional trade.

Alongside the trans-Afghan route, the route through Iran is also important. For India, Central Asia, and Afghanistan, the Chabahar port is of particular significance, as are its links with the International North–South Transport Corridor and the Ashgabat Agreement. This option does not replace the trans-Afghan route, but it increases the resilience of the trade system. Events of recent years have shown that the closure or restriction of individual routes quickly increases the importance of alternative pathways through Iran and the countries of Central Asia.

Road corridors remain a necessary complement to railways. They are especially important for perishable products, small consignments, e-commerce, pharmaceuticals, and high-value-added goods. In this area, the key factors are not only roads, but also border procedures, the permit system for carriers, weight control, insurance, the safety of parking areas, and access to backhaul cargo.

The development of air connectivity plays a separate role. Direct flights between Tashkent, Samarkand, Almaty, Astana, Delhi, Mumbai, Lahore, and other cities do not create mass freight logistics, but they reduce barriers to business travel, tourism, education, medical services, and managerial oversight of investment projects. For modern business, such mobility is not a secondary factor, but a systemic one.

5. Energy partnership: from project-based logic to a regional market

Energy is one of the most obvious areas of complementarity between Central and South Asia. The Central Asian countries possess significant resources in natural gas, hydropower, solar power, and wind generation. South Asia, primarily Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, faces high energy demand, seasonal consumption peaks, and the need for a more reliable supply structure.

The most advanced interregional project in the electricity sector is CASA-1000. According to World Bank materials, the project is intended to ensure the transmission of up to 1,300 MW of surplus summer electricity from Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan to Afghanistan and Pakistan. The project also provides for high-voltage transmission infrastructure, including power transmission lines and converter stations. Its significance goes beyond the energy sector: it demonstrates the possibility of contract-based electricity trade between the subregions with the participation of international financial institutions.

In the gas sector, the best-known project is TAPI: Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India. Its planned logic is straightforward: Turkmen gas is expected to flow through Afghanistan to the energy-deficient markets of South Asia. Published descriptions of the project usually indicate a length of approximately 1,800 km and a designed capacity of up to 33 billion cubic meters of gas per year. However, TAPI remains a complex project with a high dependence on security, financing, long-term contracts, payment guarantees, and political coordination among the participants.

CASA-1000 has not only political but also measurable infrastructural significance: the project cost is estimated at approximately US$1.2 billion, while the designed transmission capacity is 1,300 MW. The Kyrgyz component provides for around 456 km of 500 kV power transmission lines. This makes it possible to view CASA-1000 as the first major example of contract-based interregional electricity trade between Central and South Asia^[5][6].

The new energy agenda includes not only the export of fuel and electricity, but also the development of low-carbon solutions. Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan are expanding projects in solar, wind, and hydropower, while also modernizing their grids. In the long term, South Asia could become a market for seasonal electricity and energy services from Central Asia. However, this requires rules for cross-border trade, compatible dispatch mechanisms, commercial guarantees, transparent tariffs, and investment in grid resilience.

Energy cooperation must take into account climate and water-related factors. In Central Asia, hydropower is closely linked to irrigation and water resource management. In South Asia, electricity demand depends on temperature peaks, urbanization, and industrial growth. Therefore, energy projects should be accompanied by mechanisms for climate adaptation, forecasting water availability, improving energy efficiency, and developing energy storage systems.

6. Investment cooperation and business ties

Investment cooperation between Central and South Asia is still developing on a case-by-case basis, but it has significant potential. Unlike trade in raw materials, investment requires a higher level of trust, legal certainty, protection of property rights, clear tax regimes, access to foreign-exchange settlements, and high-quality business information.

The most promising areas include pharmaceuticals, medical services, agro-processing, textiles, logistics, warehouse infrastructure, IT services, education, tourism, financial technologies, renewable energy, and the production of components for infrastructure projects. South Asian companies have strong competencies in IT, pharmaceuticals, and services, while Central Asia offers access to raw materials, industrial sites, growing domestic markets, and transit opportunities.

An important task is to move from one-off business contacts to a systematic investment pipeline. This requires project catalogues, clear requirements for investors, standardized public-private partnership models, dispute-resolution mechanisms, insurance against political and commercial risks, and joint workforce training programs.

Small and medium-sized enterprises are of particular importance. Large infrastructure projects create the foundation, but it is small and medium-sized businesses that fill corridors with real goods and services. For them, access to information, affordable logistics services, digital marketplaces, simplified payments, standardized documents, and support in entering a new market are critical.

Development institutions and international financial organizations can play a catalytic role. Their participation reduces risks, improves the quality of project preparation, and disciplines the participants. However, external financing does not replace national reforms. Without clear rules, transparent statistics, and effective courts, even concessional loans will not create a sustainable flow of investment.

7. The strategic role of Uzbekistan as a connector state

Uzbekistan possesses a unique set of preconditions for playing the role of a connector state. It is located at the center of Central Asia, borders all the countries of the region as well as Afghanistan, and is also a major demographic and industrial market. For a country without access to the sea, the development of external corridors is not an optional task, but a condition for long-term competitiveness.

Uzbekistan’s role is not limited to transit. A transit country earns revenue from the movement of goods, but a connector state shapes rules, services, trust, and the institutional environment. This means developing multimodal hubs, creating logistics centers, digitalizing customs procedures, expanding railway and road links, training personnel, attracting banks and insurance organizations, and providing analytical support for projects.

The southern direction strengthens Uzbekistan’s foreign economic diversification. It complements the country’s already existing links in the northern, eastern, and western directions. At the same time, the diversification of routes reduces dependence on individual markets and transit pathways, which is especially important amid instability in global trade, changes in tariff policy, and geopolitical restrictions.

Termez occupies a special place in this strategy. It can serve as a border logistics center, a platform for trade with Afghanistan, a hub of humanitarian and commercial infrastructure, and a symbolic space for discussing connectivity between Central and South Asia. To turn this role into a sustainable result, investment is needed in terminals, railway approaches, warehouse capacity, services for carriers, and a system for analyzing cargo flows.

Uzbekistan’s strength also lies in its ability to put forward multilateral initiatives. Interregional connectivity cannot be implemented through bilateral agreements alone. It requires the alignment of interests among the countries of Central Asia, the countries of South Asia, Afghanistan, international financial institutions, business, and the expert community. In this sphere, Uzbekistan can act as a coordinator of the agenda and a provider of analytical solutions.

8. Key barriers and ways to overcome them

The first barrier is incomplete infrastructure. Many corridors exist in the form of project concepts or partially functioning routes. To transform them into commercially sustainable directions, technical and economic feasibility studies, agreed tariffs, clear sources of financing, unified operational models, and transparent risk allocation are required.

The second barrier is security and the predictability of transit. For business, what matters is not only the length of the route, but also the likelihood of delays, losses, border closures, changes in rules, and additional payments. Therefore, transport policy should include insurance mechanisms, security standards, corridor monitoring, crisis protocols, and regular information exchange among government agencies.

The third barrier is administrative fragmentation. Different documents, uncoordinated customs procedures, weak advance declaration, the absence of mutual recognition of certain certificates, and limited digital interoperability increase the cost of trade. The solution lies in the transition to electronic transport documents, the expansion of the single-window principle, the introduction of risk-based control, and the coordination of technical standards.

The scale of the financial challenge can be assessed through the example of CAREC: in 2021–2024, transport investment under the program amounted to US$8.61 billion, with a significant share of financing provided by international partners. This shows that infrastructure corridors require not only a political decision, but also a sustainable financial architecture^[7][8].

Administrative barriers have a measurable expression. According to CAREC monitoring, in 2022, the average border-crossing time on road corridors was 9.9 hours, while on railway corridors it was 40.6 hours. This confirms that the digitalization of documents, advance declaration, and risk-based control can produce an effect even without the immediate construction of new arterial routes.

The fourth barrier is financial constraints. Infrastructure projects require large capital investments and have long payback periods. A combination of budget funds, loans from international financial organizations, public-private partnerships, guarantees, project financing, and blended-finance mechanisms is needed. At the same time, each project must undergo an assessment of commercial viability, not only political attractiveness.

The fifth barrier is the lack of market information. Companies often do not know potential partners, market requirements, logistics tariffs, certification rules, or available financial instruments. This barrier can be reduced through digital trade platforms, business missions, sectoral catalogues, regular exhibitions, analytical reviews, and consulting centers under chambers of commerce and industry.

The sixth barrier is climate and resource-related risks. Mountainous areas, droughts, floods, changes in glacial runoff, and extreme weather events affect roads, energy, and agriculture. New corridors should be designed with climate resilience in mind, while energy projects should take into account the water balance and the seasonality of demand.

Practical priorities through 2030

9. The Termez Dialogue as an institutional foundation for cooperation

The Termez Dialogue on Connectivity between Central and South Asia can become an important institutional platform for coordinating the interregional agenda. In 2025, the first dialogue was held in Termez, dedicated to the formation of a shared space of peace, friendship, and prosperity. The very choice of Termez emphasizes the city’s practical role as Uzbekistan’s southern hub and as a symbolic point of connection with Afghanistan and South Asia.

The effectiveness of such a format will depend on whether it can move from general statements to the management of a project-based agenda. For this purpose, it would be advisable to structure the dialogue around four permanent tracks: transport and logistics, trade and standards, energy and climate, and investment and human capital. Each track should have a project map, progress indicators, responsible participants, and a mechanism for annual updates.

The participation of business is of particular importance. States can sign framework documents, but real demand for corridors is generated by exporters, importers, carriers, banks, insurance companies, terminal operators, and manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, within the framework of the Termez Dialogue, business sessions, B2B platforms, sectoral presentations, and discussions of specific barriers faced by companies are necessary.

The expert track should serve as an evidence base. It can prepare an annual report on the state of connectivity between Central and South Asia, a corridor-readiness index, monitoring of transportation time and costs, a review of regulatory barriers, analysis of investment projects, and recommendations for governments. In this area, Uzbekistan’s analytical institutions can play a leading role.

The Termez Dialogue is also important as an instrument for involving Afghanistan in economic processes on a pragmatic basis. This is not a matter of political legitimization, but of reducing economic isolation, developing transit procedures, supporting sustainable livelihoods, and creating incentives for stability. This logic corresponds to the interests of all participants, since Afghanistan’s economic predictability directly affects the cost and security of interregional routes.

10. Connectivity and the Sustainable Development Goals

Economic connectivity between Central and South Asia is directly linked to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The development of energy networks supports SDG 7, the expansion of trade and employment corresponds to SDG 8, the construction of resilient infrastructure is linked to SDG 9, the reduction of spatial isolation contributes to SDG 10, climate resilience relates to SDG 13, and regional coordination and partnerships correspond to SDG 16 and SDG 17.

However, the link with the SDGs does not arise automatically. Infrastructure can promote development, but it can also deepen inequality if benefits accrue only to major actors while local communities bear the costs. Therefore, projects should include environmental assessment, social safeguards, consultations with the population, management of land-related issues, occupational safety measures, and transparent compensation mechanisms.

Special attention should be paid to women, youth, and small enterprises. New corridors create demand for services in logistics, trade, catering, repair, digital support, education, and tourism. If access to these opportunities is opened to local entrepreneurs, infrastructure will become a source of inclusive growth, not merely transit rent.

Climate risk is already becoming an economic factor. According to World Bank estimates, by 2030, nearly 90% of South Asia’s population may be exposed to intense heat, while more than one fifth of the population may face the risk of severe flooding. For Central Asia, the key constraint is water: in Uzbekistan, the volume of water withdrawal significantly exceeds internal renewable resources, and the current water deficit may increase to 7 billion m³ by 2030 and to 15 billion m³ by 2050^[9][10][11].

The climate dimension of connectivity is becoming increasingly important. South Asia and Central Asia are exposed to the risks of extreme weather events, glacier melt, droughts, floods, and tensions around water. Therefore, new roads, railways, power transmission lines, and logistics centers should be designed with long-term climate scenarios in mind. For the energy sector, this means combining electricity trade, energy efficiency, renewable sources, and grid resilience.

From the standpoint of sustainable development, the most promising model is not one of raw-material transit, but one of value-added creation. This implies agro-processing, industrial cooperation, service chains, digital trade, the localization of selected industries, and workforce training. In this case, connectivity is transformed from the movement of goods into a mechanism of structural modernization.

11. Conclusion

Economic connectivity between Central and South Asia is one of the key conditions for the sustainable development of the macroregion. It is capable of expanding sales markets, reducing transport isolation, strengthening energy security, supporting employment, and creating new incentives for regional stability. At the same time, the expected effect depends not on a single project, but on a coordinated package of measures.

The main practical conclusion is the need for a portfolio approach. The trans-Afghan railway, the route through Iran, road corridors, air connectivity, the CASA-1000 and TAPI energy projects, trade digitalization, logistics hubs, and investment platforms should be viewed as mutually complementary elements. Each of them has different implementation timelines, risks, and economic logic; therefore, the regional strategy should ensure redundancy and flexibility.

Uzbekistan has objective advantages for the role of a connector state. Its geography, demographic potential, industrial base, southern hub in Termez, and active foreign economic agenda make it possible to bring together the interests of Central and South Asia.

The Termez Dialogue can become a platform where political will is translated into project-level discipline. For this to happen, it should generate not only declarations, but also a list of projects, indicators, road maps, evaluation mechanisms, and permanent channels of interaction among business, experts, and government agencies.

In the long term, connectivity between Central and South Asia should be oriented not only toward increasing trade volumes, but also toward improving the quality of development. A sustainable macroregion will take shape where infrastructure is connected with institutions, energy with climate responsibility, trade with industrial cooperation, and diplomatic initiatives with evidence-based analysis and practical results.

Muhammad Babadjanov,

Head of Department

at The Institute for Macroeconomic and Regional Studies

under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan

[1] https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/south-asia-regional-integration/trade

[2] https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=TJ-UZ-KZ-TM-KG

[3] https://data.worldbank.org/country/south-asia

[4] https://uzembassy.kz/en/article/the-mazar-i-sharif-kabul-peshawar-railway-will-open-up-broad-prospects-for-international-trade

[5] https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/afghanistan/brief/updated-q-a-on-casa-1000-resumption-in-afghanistan

[6] https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/11/01/additional-financing-for-casa-1000-project-for-the-kyrgyz-republic

[7] https://www.carecprogram.org/uploads/03-CAREC-Transport-Strategy-2030-Midterm-Review-Draft-Report.pdf

[8] https://cpmm.carecprogram.org/2022-report/key-results/

[9] https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/06/03/climate-resilience-in-south-asia-will-be-private-sector-led

[10] https://data.worldbank.org/country/uzbekistan

[11] https://www.adb.org/news/features/numbers-climate-change-central-asia

Today, environmental protection and climate change have become one of the most promising and dynamic areas of strategic cooperation between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. Both countries have identified the transition to a green economy, climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals as key priorities of their national development agendas. Consequently, environmental cooperation between the two countries has expanded steadily in recent years, not only at the bilateral level but also within regional and international frameworks.

Environmental cooperation between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan is based on the Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of Environmental Protection, signed in Baku on 11 September 2008. To elevate bilateral cooperation to a new qualitative level, the two sides are currently drafting a new intergovernmental agreement on cooperation in the field of environmental protection. The agreement is expected to provide a solid institutional framework for harmonizing the environmental policies of both countries and facilitating the implementation of long-term joint initiatives.

In recent years, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan have significantly strengthened cooperation through environmental diplomacy. In December 2023, during a meeting of ministers from the member states of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), held on the sidelines of COP28 in Dubai, participants discussed the efficient use of natural resources, sustainable development, and the circular economy. The meeting marked an important milestone in advancing dialogue between the environmental authorities of the two countries.

A major step forward in bilateral environmental cooperation came in 2024 during COP29 in Baku. The first-ever meeting of environment ministers from the member states of the Organization of Turkic States was held at the Uzbekistan National Pavilion. The meeting concluded with the adoption of a declaration aimed at strengthening cooperation in the fields of ecology and environmental protection.

During COP29, the Asian Development Bank launched the regional From Glaciers to Farms programme. The initiative is designed to mitigate the impacts of glacier melt across Central Asia, the South Caucasus, and Pakistan, promote integrated water resources management, and enhance the resilience of agriculture and social infrastructure. The programme envisages mobilizing USD 3.5 billion in investments over the period 2025–2034.

Environmental cooperation extends well beyond intergovernmental dialogue. During 2023–2024, young environmental activists from Azerbaijan actively participated in the International Eco Camp held in Samarkand. The initiative promotes environmental awareness among young people, facilitates the exchange of experience and strengthens regional cooperation.

In 2024, a delegation from the Press Service of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan visited Uzbekistan to learn about the work of the Press Service of the National Committee on Ecology and Climate Change. The visit took place within the framework of the First Uzbekistan–Azerbaijan Media Forum and contributed to the exchange of best practices in environmental communications.

In 2025, Mukhtar Babayev, Special Representative of the President of Azerbaijan and President of COP29, was among the first distinguished participants in the international conference "Central Asia in the Face of Global Climate Threats: Solidarity for Shared Prosperity," held in Samarkand. In 2026, a delegation from the National Committee on Ecology and Climate Change of Uzbekistan participated in a regional seminar organized in Baku by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).

According to experts, several promising avenues exist for further deepening environmental cooperation between the two countries.

First, Azerbaijan has accumulated significant experience in air quality monitoring and the development of green infrastructure. Therefore, exchanging expertise in green urban development, improving ambient air quality and environmental monitoring would be mutually beneficial.

Second, expanding joint scientific research through Green University and promoting exchanges of faculty members and young researchers would further strengthen scientific capacity in the field of ecology and sustainable development.

Third, sharing best practices in the management of protected natural areas and national parks would facilitate the introduction of modern approaches to biodiversity conservation.

Fourth, the signing of a new intergovernmental agreement on environmental cooperation, together with the establishment of a joint working group to coordinate its implementation, would provide a systematic framework for further expanding bilateral cooperation.

Fifth, Azerbaijan's accession to the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals would significantly strengthen regional cooperation in biodiversity conservation and the protection of migratory routes.

Environmental cooperation between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan is gradually evolving into a comprehensive strategic partnership encompassing climate diplomacy, the green economy, environmental education, scientific research and regional initiatives. The anticipated signing of a new intergovernmental agreement, the expansion of scientific cooperation through Green University and the implementation of joint projects in green urban development, air quality monitoring and the management of protected natural areas are expected to elevate bilateral cooperation to a new level.

This partnership will make a meaningful contribution not only to strengthening the environmental security of Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, but also to promoting sustainable development across the Turkic world and the wider regions of Central Asia and the South Caucasus.

In the 21st century, the rapid development of global economic ties has further heightened the strategic importance of transport and logistics systems. From this perspective, strengthening transport cooperation among the member states of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) —located in a key geoeconomic region connecting Europe and Asia—has become a priority.

Within the OTS framework, practical initiatives are being advanced to develop modern transport corridors, build up transit capacity, and create a single logistics space. This serves not only to deepen regional integration but also to ensure sustainable economic growth and connectivity across Eurasia.

The OTS countries are among Uzbekistan's primary trade and economic partners. Specifically, Uzbekistan maintains a large volume of trade with Kazakhstan, a free trade agreement with Azerbaijan, and most-favored-nation status with Turkey and Hungary.

In 2023, Uzbekistan's cargo transport volume with OTS member countries reached 17.5 million tons, accounting for nearly 38 percent of its total export-import shipments.

To further intensify multilateral cooperation within the Organization and strengthen the strategic partnership between its member states, the 12th Summit of the Organization of Turkic States was held on October 7, 2024, in Gabala, Azerbaijan, under the motto "Regional Peace and Security."

Following the summit, the parties adopted the 121-point Gabala Declaration. This document outlined a number of priority objectives for expanding cooperation in the political, economic, transport, communications, energy, and security spheres. The declaration paid special attention to the transport sector, identifying the further strengthening of transport connectivity between Europe and Asia, the enhancement of the region's transit potential, and the expansion of trade and economic ties as key tasks.

Additionally, the development of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Corridor (the Middle Corridor) was recognized as one of the organization's strategic priorities. Special emphasis was placed on increasing the efficiency of freight supply chains across Eurasia, diversifying transport routes, and enhancing the region's importance in the global logistics system by improving this corridor.

Furthermore, an agreement was reached at the summit to implement the "OTS+" format, aimed at expanding the geographical scope of cooperation between the Organization of Turkic States and external partners and third countries.

At this summit, the head of our state underscored the importance of connecting the Middle Corridor with the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway and the Trans-Afghan Corridor, as well as digitalizing customs procedures and optimizing tariffs. The proposed initiatives were supported by the organization's member states, who expressed their readiness for joint work in these areas.

According to experts, the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway is expected to create the shortest corridor from China to countries in Europe and the Middle East, reducing the distance by 900 kilometers and freight delivery times by 7–8 days.

The construction of the Uzbekistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan railway is another vital project for transregional cooperation. This project will link the South Asian railway system with the railway networks of Central Asia and Eurasia.

In recent years, as attention to the Trans-Caspian Corridor has grown, the volume of freight transported along it has been steadily increasing. In 2023, the transit of Uzbek cargo on this route through the Port of Baku exceeded 1.2 million tons, and there are plans to increase this figure to 1.5 million tons in the near future.

Uzbekistan is an active user of the strategic "China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan–Turkmenistan/Kazakhstan–Caspian Sea–Azerbaijan–Georgia–Turkey–Europe" route, which runs through the member states of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS). In cooperation with the OTS, special importance is attached to the development of this corridor. Specifically, large-scale work is underway to modernize infrastructure and coordinate logistics processes.

As the development and diversification of global logistics chains and transport corridors, along with the formation of a unified transit network, become particularly relevant, realizing the potential of the Organization of Turkic States is coming to the forefront.

Within the OTS framework, special attention is also given to implementing digital solutions in supply chains. In particular, an electronic permit exchange system (e-Permit) has been established among the Organization's member states, and the e-TIR system has been implemented with Azerbaijan. Alongside these efforts, solutions such as electronic customs, automated cargo tracking systems, and the "digital customs corridor" are being widely introduced in OTS countries.

The aforementioned initiatives are an important step toward creating a single transport space among the Turkic states. Through digital systems, new transport routes, and joint investments, the OTS countries are deepening their mutual integration and strengthening their positions within the Eurasian transport network.

IA “Dunyo”

Namangan is one of Uzbekistan’s regions with a rich centuries-old history. The area has been continuously inhabited for more than two thousand years. The Namangan region was established as an administrative unit in 1941. Today, its population exceeds three million people. The area covers 7,900 km², and its administrative centre is the city of Namangan. The city is located at an altitude of about 450 metres above sea level.

Namangan is one of the most densely populated regions of Uzbekistan. As a result, public life is highly active, and economic, cultural, and educational processes are developing dynamically. The annual International Flower Festival is especially well known.

The Flower Festival was first held in Namangan in August 1961 as a flower exhibition. In 2018, it received international status, and since then it has attracted participants and guests from various countries. Today, it has become one of Uzbekistan’s largest international cultural celebrations.

This year marks the 65th anniversary edition of the festival. Over the years, the event has gained recognition not only in the country but also internationally.

The festival attracts significant interest not only from residents of Uzbekistan but also from neighbouring countries, as well as international experts and specialists. Preparations for the event are currently in full swing.

According to organisers, around 1 million foreign tourists from more than 50 countries and over 7 million local visitors are expected this year. The 50-day festival will include more than 150 cultural, educational, and entertainment events.

A key feature of this year’s festival may be its inclusion in the Guinness World Records. A process is currently underway to set a record for the largest-scale flower planting within a month. The process is being monitored for transparency by a representative of the organization in the UAE, Kanzy Defrawy, in accordance with international standards.

The festival will run from 24 May to 12 July. Its programme includes gala concerts, drone shows, car parades, open-air symphony concerts, fashion weeks, exhibitions, and international forums on tourism, investment, and business.

As part of the preparations, around 5 million seasonal flowers have been planted across the city and districts, giving the region a bright and festive appearance.

The opening ceremony will take place on 24 May at Babur Park in Namangan. On this day, a flower-decorated car parade will be held through the city streets, and in the evening a concert featuring local and international artists will take place at the amphitheatre of the “New Uzbekistan” Park.

Throughout the festival, daily programmes will include theatre performances, puppet shows for children, handicraft fairs, workshops, and regular concerts in parks.

In late May and early June, several major events are planned, including a symphony concert, a retro music evening, “Fashion Days” shows, a lavender festival, and a concert by Yulduz Usmonova. A drone show is also scheduled for 1 June.

Sports enthusiasts will be able to enjoy wrestling competitions, motocross events, international tournaments, and ethnosport games.

The festival will also host international conferences on biodiversity, artificial intelligence, tourism, and economics, highlighting its scientific significance.

In addition, gastronomic festivals, youth environmental campaigns, competitions, and special programmes for children are planned.

The festival will conclude on 12 July with a closing and award ceremony at the “New Uzbekistan” Park.

In summary, the International Flower Festival in Namangan is not only a celebration of flowers but also a large-scale international event that combines culture, art, sport, and science.

Dunyo IA

In an era characterized by growing disunity among global powers, the strategies employed by so-called “middle” states in forging stable regional relations present promising solutions for achieving international peace and cooperation. Uzbekistan, a Central Asian nation situated at the heart of the historic Silk Road, and Finland, a Nordic state with a unique experience as a neutral border state during the Cold War, exemplify how a consistent commitment to dialogue can contribute to regional stability amidst the complexities of global relations.

Geographically separated, these countries have developed strikingly similar approaches to ensuring sustainable development, peace, and stability in their regions. They address key regional security challenges by strengthening multifaceted and mutually beneficial good-neighborly relations with their neighbors. Additionally, they engage in multilateral, long-term partnerships with interested countries and organizations.

While Uzbekistan and Finland have been shaped by different historical contexts, these experiences have contributed to the development of a shared diplomatic philosophy centered around stability, cooperation, sovereign equality, mutual respect, and multilateral interaction.

Central Asia, a region steeped in ancient history, has long been a cultural and historical hub. Centuries ago, it was a unified space where politics, economics, and culture intertwined seamlessly. As one of the cradles of human civilization, Central Asia boasts a rich tapestry of history and a vibrant cultural heritage that has shaped universal values. These values emphasize cooperation over confrontation, tolerance over imposition, and the belief that the well-being of neighbors is intrinsically linked to one’s own.

Since gaining independence in 1991, Uzbekistan has consistently championed a policy of regional interaction. This policy, which gained prominence under President Shavkat Mirziyoyev in 2016, became a cornerstone of Uzbekistan’s foreign policy. Tashkent’s “diplomatic offensive” to enhance intra-regional cooperation became one of the most significant policy changes that transformed relations in modern Central Asia.

Tashkent’s unprecedented focus on dialogue and building trust with neighboring states has transformed Uzbekistan into the primary organizer of cooperation in the region. It has advocated for the development of multilateral interaction mechanisms, spanning various domains such as water resource management, transport corridor expansion, industrial cooperation, border demarcation, and regional security.

The positive impact of these policy changes has reverberated throughout the entire region. After 2016, economic cooperation witnessed a remarkable surge, leading to a nearly doubling of the total GDP of Central Asian states from $273 billion to $520 billion. Trust and strengthened ties between countries have facilitated a 4.5-fold increase in intra-regional trade, soaring from $2.4 billion to $11 billion. Moreover, the number of tourists visiting the region has doubled, further boosting its appeal.

The collective openness and enhanced stability have become attractive factors for third countries, resulting in a significant increase in the region’s foreign trade. This growth has seen a remarkable rise of over 200 percent, from $112 billion to $253 billion.

Finland’s diplomatic traditions were shaped by its unique position at the crossroads of Eastern and Western “spheres of influence.” Its vulnerable geographical location drove its pursuit of interaction and stability.

Finland consistently advocates for strengthening friendly relations with all countries, particularly its neighbors, and fostering ties within Nordic cooperation structures like the Nordic Council, the Council of Ministers of the Nordic Countries, and the Nordic Investment Bank.

This approach is reflected in Finland’s active involvement in the OSCE with aims to enhance dialogue and trust.

Finland’s 2025 OSCE chairmanship, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, holds symbolic significance. It exemplifies Finland’s commitment to building bridges, fostering dialogue, and cultivating trust, aligning with its dialogue-based foreign policy. Finnish diplomacy consistently emphasizes the importance of strengthening common positions and approaches among states, reflecting Finland’s consensus-oriented diplomatic style, which Uzbekistan shares as well.

It’s worth noting that both countries adhere to the same fundamental principles of international law. Respect for national sovereignty, non-interference in internal affairs, and the inviolability of borders serve as practical guidelines shaping Uzbekistan and Finland’s foreign policy, regional behavior, and international positioning.

Tashkent’s approaches to regional interaction resonate with Helsinki’s priorities for cooperation with the Nordic and Baltic countries. Uzbekistan’s efforts in resolving border disputes and collaborating on water resources in the region mirror Finland’s approach to peacebuilding and fostering cooperation.

Furthermore, both countries have established themselves as advocates of results-oriented cooperation. They are pragmatic architects of projects that create mutual benefits and strengthen regional stability and interregional connectivity.

Under the leadership of President Sh. Mirziyoyev, Uzbekistan is actively promoting the development of transport infrastructure within Central Asia and with neighboring regions, including the West, East, and South. For instance, the development of the “Middle Corridor” (Trans-Caspian International Transport Route) has led to a remarkable six-fold increase in cargo shipments along it over four years, from 2020 to 2024, reaching a substantial volume of 4.5 million tons. Tashkent is also actively involved in the construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway and is promoting connectivity between Central and South Asia.

Economic cooperation and environmental protection are additional pillars of Uzbekistan’s regional strategy. These aspects play a crucial role in Uzbekistan’s environmental programs, particularly in mitigating the consequences of the Aral Sea disaster.

Finland, following a similar pattern of project-oriented cooperation, has been an active participant in initiatives of the Nordic Council and the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. These initiatives encompass cross-border cooperation in environmental protection, innovation, and people-to-people contacts. Finland also promotes initiatives of the Trans-European Transport Network and Arctic connectivity.

Known for its leadership in environmental protection, Finland actively participates in cross-border economic projects with partners from the Nordic and Baltic countries.

Alongside their close cooperation with countries in their respective regions, Uzbekistan and Finland pursue a policy of strategic multilateralism. Both countries actively participate in various regional and global institutions, reflecting their shared views that modern challenges require collective responses. They believe that “middle powers” can exert effective influence through institutional engagement.

Since 2016, Uzbekistan has significantly increased its involvement in regional organizations, primarily the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Organization of Turkic States (OTS), and various United Nations bodies.

Additionally, the “Central Asia +” (C5+1) platform, now comprising over 10 partner countries and organizations, actively promotes interregional cooperation. Notably, the inaugural “Central Asia – European Union” summit held in April 2025 resulted in an agreement on “deep and comprehensive cooperation” between the two regions.

Finland’s international engagement, while having a longer history, also follows a similar pattern of active institutional participation. As a member of the European Union since 1995 and multiple international organizations, Finland maintains its traditional interactions with regional structures in Northern and Baltic Europe.

As the international landscape becomes increasingly intricate, Uzbekistan and Finland encounter similar challenges that test their historically established unique diplomatic approaches.

Uzbekistan faces the primary challenge of sustaining the momentum for deepening regional partnership and intensifying cooperation with external actors amidst escalating geopolitical tensions, environmental threats, and economic shocks.

From Uzbekistan’s perspective, responding to the changing geopolitical landscape and the economic transformation needs of Central Asia requires strengthened cooperation, both among Central Asian countries and between regions.

Finland’s challenge lies in finding a balance between its commitments within the EU and NATO and its traditional role as a mediator in building consensus and dialogue, particularly in organizations like the OSCE, where it continues to promote “strengthening dialogue and trust.”

Overall, Uzbekistan and Finland exemplify successful regional cooperation based on a consistent commitment to dialogue and interaction. Despite their distinct geographical and historical contexts, both countries have adopted similar foreign policy approaches focused on conflict prevention, institutional engagement, and pragmatic regionalism.

In an interconnected world characterized by great power rivalry, the diplomatic approaches of Uzbekistan and Finland serve as a reminder that sustainable security and prosperity are achieved through dialogue, cooperation, and practical collaboration, rather than diktat, isolation, or empty rhetoric.

And unsurprisingly, these foreign policy approaches positively impact the lives of their citizens. It’s not a coincidence that Finland consistently ranks as the “happiest country in the world” for the eighth consecutive year in the World Happiness Report. Similarly, Uzbekistan leads in the level of happiness among Central Asian countries in the same ranking.

Sharif Akhmedov,

Chief Researcher at the Institute for Strategic and Regional Studies under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Today, global development is proceeding at an unprecedented pace of urbanization — by 2050, nearly 68% of the world’s population is expected to live in cities.

This process is also advancing rapidly in Uzbekistan: the country’s population has exceeded 38 million, the urbanization rate has reached 51%, and nearly 20 million people now live in urban areas.

According to economic analyses, every 1% increase in the urbanization rate grows the economy by at least 1% and accelerates investment flows and startup development — making reforms in this sector of strategic importance.

With this in mind, within the framework of Uzbekistan’s urbanization policy, the practice of “chaotic construction” has been abandoned in favor of smart and integrated territorial development — an approach recognized as essential in global best practices.

One of the most important institutional steps was the establishment of the National Committee for the Sustainable Development of Urbanization and the Housing Market. This body serves as the central “think tank” unifying architecture, economics, and social policy into a single system.

To reduce administrative barriers in the construction sector, the number of permitting stages has been cut by a factor of 3, and processing timelines by a factor of 4. Additionally, 420 outdated urban planning norms have been restructured, replaced by 140 modern regulatory documents.

Furthermore, in Uzbekistan, land ownership no longer automatically grants the right to build — the process is now based on the principle of integrated territorial development.

Most importantly, a strict principle has been enshrined in law: schools, clinics, and modern utilities must be built before or simultaneously with residential construction.

These new mechanisms provide, above all, trust and financial stability. To ensure stability in the housing market and strengthen buyer confidence, measures have been taken to fully eliminate the risk of “unfinished constructions.” To this end, a system of escrow accounts is being widely introduced in Uzbekistan for the first time.

Through this modern mechanism, citizens’ funds are securely held in banks until the keys to the property are handed over. Developers, in turn, gain access to affordable and convenient project financing. As a result, urban development has transformed from a chaotic process into a managed industry operating under transparent rules.

Development Strategy and Achievements

Over the past eight years, 120 million square meters of housing have been built across the country. The total volume of construction work grew from 30 trillion soums in 2016 to 314 trillion soums last year, and the sector now employs more than 3.5 million people.

According to the state’s long-term priority strategy, the following key targets have been set:

• Raise the urbanization rate to 60%;
• Increase housing provision from 18.9 square meters per capita to 23 square meters;
• Nearly double the annual housing construction volume to 30.3 million square meters.

Innovative Mega-Projects and an Ecological Approach

The most vivid practical expression of this strategy is the “New Tashkent” mega-project, rising across 20,000 hectares. Designed for a population of 1 million residents, this ecologically clean, high-tech metropolis implements the globally recognized “15-minute city” concept. The project includes the creation of a 420-hectare “green belt,” the planting of 200,000 trees, and a fully ecological transport system (electric buses, metro, and bicycle lanes).

These high living standards are not limited to the capital. Across the country, 56 “New Uzbekistan” residential districts, each designed for at least 70,000 residents and equipped with rich social infrastructure, are being constructed at an accelerated pace.

In conclusion, Uzbekistan has formed a sustainable and effective model for managing urbanization, encompassing the National Committee, the escrow system, and the smart “New Uzbekistan” districts. By transforming modern cities into ecologically clean, socially oriented, and livable spaces, the country is establishing a high benchmark for urbanization in the Eurasian region.

Today, Asia is playing a decisive role in global economic processes, bringing together major production capacities, rapidly growing consumer markets, and technological and financial centres. At the same time, geopolitical developments, changes in global trade and logistics chains, climate risks, and intensifying competition for investment resources are further increasing the importance of dialogue and practical cooperation among Asian countries.

Against this backdrop, economic cooperation within the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia (CICA) is becoming increasingly important. Today, CICA brings together 28 countries, covering nearly 90 percent of the Asian continent and more than half of the world’s population. CICA member states account for more than 50 percent of global GDP and nearly two-thirds of global economic growth. This demonstrates the significant potential for expanding economic and financial cooperation across the CICA region.

Uzbekistan has consistently viewed cooperation within CICA as an important instrument not only for ensuring peace and stability in Asia, but also for expanding practical partnerships aimed at economic development and prosperity.

New Opportunities for Uzbekistan

The rapid economic growth observed in Uzbekistan and the ongoing modernization of the economy are, in turn, increasing demand for long-term investment, private capital, and modern financial instruments.

As President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev noted at the ceremonial event dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the country’s independence, Uzbekistan plans to attract $450 billion in foreign investment over the next decade and increase GDP to $300 billion by 2030 while maintaining high economic growth rates.

One of the key tasks in achieving these objectives is not only to increase investment volumes, but also to diversify their sources and make greater use of private and institutional investors, capital markets, public-private partnerships, and other modern financial mechanisms.

This process is also in line with global trends. According to United Nations estimates, the annual financing gap for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in developing countries is estimated at more than $4 trillion. This means that sustaining economic growth solely through traditional sources of financing is becoming increasingly challenging, while the need for new forms of investment and financial cooperation among countries continues to grow.

At the 6th CICA Summit held in Astana on October 13, 2022, President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev emphasized the importance of strengthening connectivity across the Asian continent, primarily through the development of production and logistics chains and transport corridors effectively linking Central Asia with South and East Asia, as well as the Middle East.

This issue is of not only strategic but also tangible economic importance for Uzbekistan. In 2025, the country’s foreign trade turnover reached $81.2 billion, an increase of 20.7 percent compared to 2024.

At the same time, the majority of Uzbekistan’s key trading partners are located within the CICA region. In 2025, China accounted for 21.2 percent of the country’s foreign trade turnover, Russia for 16 percent, Kazakhstan for 6.1 percent, Türkiye for 3.7 percent, and the Republic of Korea for 2.1 percent.

The President of the Republic of Uzbekistan has also placed particular emphasis on the development of the knowledge economy within CICA, highlighting the need to make fuller use of the potential for technology and innovation transfer, promote digitalization, and coordinate the efforts of Asian countries to develop cloud technologies, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things.

This area is becoming increasingly relevant in the context of CICA’s emerging financial agenda. The development of the digital economy is creating new opportunities for modern payment systems, fintech solutions, digital financial services, and cross-border financial cooperation.

Another important area is the initiative to establish regular expert consultations on the rapid greening of countries and ensuring ecosystem connectivity within the framework of the “Green Asia” conceptual programme. This initiative is directly aligned with efforts to expand green and sustainable finance and attract private capital to climate and energy transition projects.

A New Stage of Financial Cooperation

Financial cooperation is becoming one of the key components of connectivity within CICA.

A major step in this direction was the establishment of the CICA Financial Summit. The Regulation on the new consultative body was adopted in 2025. According to the document, its activities are aimed at developing cooperation among member states in the financial sector in order to ensure financial stability, promote sustainable economic development, and enhance the prosperity of the CICA region.

The new mechanism began its practical activities this year. On September 8, 2026, the first meeting of the CICA Financial Summit was held in Astana. It brought together representatives of government authorities, national financial institutions, the banking sector, businesses, international organizations, and the expert community.

The emergence of a dedicated platform for financial dialogue demonstrates the changing nature of economic cooperation in Asia.

Today, financial connectivity is becoming no less important than connectivity in transport or trade. The implementation of large-scale infrastructure projects requires long-term capital; the development of cross-border trade requires efficient settlement and financial mechanisms; the green transition requires new investment instruments; and the rapid development of technology calls for closer cooperation between financial regulators and market participants.

These areas are shaping the substance and priorities of CICA’s new financial mechanism.

The agenda of the inaugural meeting also demonstrated the broad scope of this cooperation. Key areas of focus included financial connectivity, development finance, sustainable and inclusive finance, digital finance, and financial technologies.

Thus, the initiative is not about establishing yet another financial institution or development bank. Rather, it is creating a platform for cooperation among existing national financial institutions, regulatory authorities, banks, stock exchanges, and development institutions of CICA member states.

In this regard, the emerging financial mechanisms within CICA create additional opportunities to translate the initiatives put forward by the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on connectivity, digital development, and green growth into practical investment projects, while also strengthening Uzbekistan’s role as an active participant in the new financial linkages taking shape across Asia.

President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev will participate in the upcoming 13^th Summit of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS), which will be held in Ankara, Türkiye.

Ahead of the 13th Summit of the Organization of Turkic States, scheduled to be held in Ankara, economic cooperation within the OTS is acquiring new substance. Alongside trade and investment, industrial cooperation, transport corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence and co-financing mechanisms are emerging as practical areas of engagement. The preparation of the OTS Strategy for 2027–2031 further increases the economic significance of the Ankara meeting.

Today, the Organization of Turkic States covers a significant economic space connecting Central Asia, the South Caucasus and Türkiye with European markets. By the end of 2025, the combined nominal GDP of the OTS countries amounted to approximately $2.3 trillion, while their GDP at purchasing power parity exceeded $6.2 trillion. Their aggregate foreign trade turnover surpassed $1.2 trillion.

These figures indicate the presence of a large market for expanding economic cooperation. At the same time, the volume of mutual trade among the OTS countries remains limited relative to their overall economic potential. The next stage of cooperation is therefore increasingly focused on moving beyond the simple expansion of trade toward deeper industrial cooperation, lower transport costs and the financing of joint investment projects.

Differences in the economic structures of the OTS countries provide a foundation for such cooperation. Türkiye has a substantial manufacturing base in machinery, automotive production, electrical engineering, textiles and chemicals. Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, in addition to their energy resources, hold significant positions in metallurgy and petrochemicals. Uzbekistan is developing its textile and garment industry, electrical engineering, automotive, chemical and food industries, as well as non-ferrous metallurgy. Kyrgyzstan’s capabilities in light industry and agriculture also provide an additional basis for expanding shared production chains.

In this context, the economic outcome of integration within the OTS will increasingly be determined not merely by the volume of mutual trade, but also by the extent to which enterprises in member countries become integrated into one another’s production chains.

Uzbekistan’s Trade with OTS Countries

For Uzbekistan, economic relations with the Turkic states have become an important component of foreign trade diversification.

In 2025, Uzbekistan’s total foreign trade turnover reached $81.2 billion, including $33.8 billion in exports and $47.4 billion in imports. Among the country’s major trading partners, turnover with Kazakhstan amounted to $5 billion, while trade with Türkiye reached $3 billion.

Kazakhstan and Türkiye alone account for roughly one-tenth of Uzbekistan’s total foreign trade. When economic relations with Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Hungary are also taken into account, the OTS space represents a distinct and sizeable regional market for Uzbekistan.

Exports have played an important role in recent trade growth. In 2025, Uzbekistan exported $1.5 billion worth of goods and services to Kazakhstan, $1.1 billion to Türkiye and $771.1 million to Kyrgyzstan.

The composition of trade also points to qualitative changes in economic relations. In 2025, industrial goods accounted for 28.2% of Uzbekistan’s exports to OTS countries, machinery and transport equipment for 19%, food products for 11.1%, chemical products for 10%, and services for 12.7%. On the import side, food products represented 22.8%, mineral fuels 20.3%, industrial goods 18.1%, and machinery and transport equipment 12.9%.

This structure highlights two important features. First, Uzbekistan’s exports to the OTS market are not limited to raw materials, with industrial goods, machinery and equipment accounting for a substantial share. Second, the presence of energy resources, industrial goods and equipment in imports indicates that mutual trade with OTS countries is also closely linked to domestic production processes.

For this reason, alongside trade turnover, the depth of industrial cooperation is becoming an increasingly important indicator of future economic relations.

Untapped Export Potential

Despite significant growth in trade, the available opportunities have yet to be fully utilized.

According to estimates by the Center for Economic Research and Reforms, Uzbekistan has the potential to increase exports to OTS countries by an additional $2.7 billion. The largest reserve is associated with the Turkish market, at $1.8 billion. Additional export potential is estimated at $500 million for Kazakhstan, $200 million for Hungary and $100 million for Kyrgyzstan.

Market size alone, however, is insufficient to ensure export growth. Product quality, mutual recognition of standards, certification procedures, transport costs, delivery times and access to trade finance all directly affect exporters’ competitiveness.

Opportunities are particularly substantial in agriculture and food products. The combined agricultural market of the OTS countries is estimated at around $72 billion. For Uzbekistan, promising export categories include fruit and vegetables, processed food products, textiles, electrical equipment, construction materials, mineral fertilizers, copper products and polymers.

The concentration of a large share of the export reserve in Türkiye and Kazakhstan is also economically significant. Türkiye offers both a sizeable domestic consumer market and access to European and Mediterranean markets. Kazakhstan, due to its geographical proximity, shared transport networks and production linkages within Central Asia, remains a natural partner for cooperation with Uzbek enterprises.

In this sense, realizing the $2.7 billion export reserve requires a coordinated approach across industrial, logistics and trade policies.

Investment Relations Are Becoming More Institutionalized

Alongside trade, investment flows from OTS countries into Uzbekistan have also increased substantially.

Between 2017 and 2025, investment attracted from OTS countries into Uzbekistan exceeded $11.5 billion. In 2025 alone, investment amounted to $3.8 billion. Türkiye was Uzbekistan’s largest investor among OTS countries, with $2.4 billion. Investment was concentrated primarily in manufacturing, energy, agriculture, construction and logistics.

As of April 2026, Uzbekistan was home to more than 4,500 enterprises with capital participation from OTS countries.

The growing number of such enterprises points to a qualitative shift in economic relations. A trade transaction ends once a product crosses the border, whereas direct investment creates longer-term links between economies through capital, technology, employment, local suppliers and export channels.

The expansion of joint industrial projects within the OTS can therefore provide an additional foundation for further growth in mutual trade.

For example, components produced in one country may be used to manufacture finished goods in another and subsequently exported to a third market. In such a case, trade statistics reflect an underlying integrated production chain. Differences in the specialization of the Turkic economies create opportunities for precisely this type of cooperation.

The Turkic Investment Fund as a New Financial Mechanism

One of the most significant institutional developments in the OTS economic architecture has been the transition of the Turkic Investment Fund to practical operations.

In 2025, its authorized capital was increased from $500 million to $600 million. Uzbekistan’s share amounts to $100 million.

The Fund’s economic significance is not limited to the size of its own capital. Its broader potential lies in using these resources to mobilize financing from other international financial institutions.

On 17 June 2026, the Turkic Investment Fund and the Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector, part of the Islamic Development Bank Group, signed an agreement on an Islamic co-financing program of up to $50 million. The program is intended to finance small and medium-sized enterprises through local financial institutions in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye and Uzbekistan.

Another practical model emerged on 1 July. The Turkic Investment Fund signed an agreement to provide up to $10 million in financing to KMF Bank in Kazakhstan, while the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development committed up to $50 million. The combined resources are intended to expand lending to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.

These two examples point to an emerging trend. Rather than functioning solely as an institution that directly allocates its own resources, the Fund could develop into a platform for mobilizing international financial resources for projects across the OTS region.

Such an approach could help mobilize investment substantially exceeding the Fund’s own $600 million capital base. This mechanism is particularly relevant for industrial cooperation, transport, energy, digital infrastructure and small business projects.

From a Transport Corridor to an Integrated Logistics System

Transport costs and delivery times remain another major factor affecting trade within the OTS region.

Because Central Asian countries lack direct access to seaports, logistics costs have a significant impact on export competitiveness. In this context, the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route — the Middle Corridor, which runs across the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan, Georgia and Türkiye toward European markets — is becoming an important infrastructure component of economic cooperation within the OTS.

For Uzbekistan, the importance of this route is increasing with the construction of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway. Connecting the new railway with the Caspian route could expand Uzbekistan’s participation in the East–West logistics chain linking China, Central Asia, the Caucasus and Europe.

A modern transport corridor, however, consists of more than roads and railways. Border procedures, permits, customs declarations, consignment notes and cargo tracking systems also affect the time and cost of transportation.

Digitalization has therefore become an important component of OTS transport policy.

The e-Permit electronic permit system is being implemented among the organization’s member states. At the 9th Meeting of OTS Ministers of Transport, held in Bishkek on 23 April 2026, a memorandum was also signed on introducing the e-CMR electronic international consignment note.

At the May summit in Turkistan, the President of Uzbekistan noted that the E-Permit system had been fully launched with OTS member states and proposed linking the Middle Corridor with the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway, developing a simplified customs corridor, and digitalizing data exchange and cargo tracking processes.

If these mechanisms are integrated into a single system, the OTS region could develop a logistics environment that facilitates both the physical movement of goods and the digital flow of accompanying documents and data.

The economic effects can be measured in concrete terms — shorter border crossing times, lower administrative costs and greater predictability of delivery schedules for exporters.

From Trade to Technological Connectivity

In 2026, another new dimension of OTS economic cooperation became increasingly visible.

On 15 May, the informal summit in Turkistan on “Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development” placed particular emphasis on digital infrastructure, innovative technologies and the practical application of artificial intelligence.

Uzbekistan proposed developing the concept of a “Digital Turkic Corridor”, aimed at connecting data centers across the region through high-speed communication channels.

Additional initiatives included the establishment of a strategic cooperation network in artificial intelligence, the organization of a Technology Forum in Tashkent and broader technological cooperation among participating countries.

There is a clear connection between transport and digital integration. While the Middle Corridor facilitates the movement of goods, the Digital Turkic Corridor could accelerate the movement of data.

As a result, two parallel types of infrastructure may develop across the OTS region — physical and digital.

The first encompasses roads and railways, ports, logistics centers and customs infrastructure. The second includes data centers, telecommunications networks, cloud computing, artificial intelligence infrastructure and digital services.

Their integration could support the expansion of e-commerce, digital logistics, fintech, cross-border services and digital production management.

The Institutional Framework for Economic Integration Is Expanding

Another feature of the changes taking place within the OTS is the emergence of permanent mechanisms for economic cooperation.

While cooperation previously relied largely on summits of heads of state, intergovernmental meetings and bilateral agreements, dedicated mechanisms are now taking shape in finance, transport and the digital economy.

The Turkic Investment Fund is establishing a mechanism for financing investment projects. E-Permit and e-CMR are digitalizing transport documentation. The Digital Turkic Corridor initiative is intended to connect information infrastructure across participating countries.

The economic value of these institutions lies primarily in their ability to complement one another.

The effectiveness of integration will therefore depend not only on reducing trade barriers, but also on developing the broader infrastructure that supports trade.

New Economic Opportunities for Uzbekistan

Developments within the OTS open several avenues for expanding Uzbekistan’s economic cooperation.

The first is access to larger export markets. The estimated $2.7 billion in additional export potential represents a significant reserve relative to existing trade flows.

The second is industrial cooperation. Türkiye’s industrial and technological base, the resources of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan’s labor resources and expanding manufacturing sector provide conditions for developing complementary production chains.

The third is transport geography. Connecting the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway with the Middle Corridor could expand Uzbekistan’s transit and logistics opportunities along the East–West axis.

The fourth is access to capital. Co-financing mechanisms involving the Turkic Investment Fund and international financial institutions could provide new sources of financing for the private sector.

The fifth is the digital economy. Integration of data centers, artificial intelligence, e-commerce and digital transport documentation could create conditions for faster growth in trade in services.

At the same time, these opportunities will not automatically translate into economic outcomes. Turning the $2.7 billion export potential into actual exports requires addressing product standards, certification, logistics costs, financing and market access at the level of specific product categories.

Likewise, the economic efficiency of transport corridors should be assessed not by their length or the number of participating countries, but by indicators such as cargo delivery times, transport costs per tonne and waiting times at border crossings.

In investment cooperation, the volume of capital attracted should be considered alongside localization levels, the participation of domestic companies in supply chains, job creation and export revenues.

Ahead of the Ankara Summit

As of September 2026, preparations are under way for the 13th OTS Summit in Ankara. On 8 September, OTS Secretary General Kubanychbek Omuraliev and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan discussed the organizational and substantive aspects of the summit as well as its expected outcomes.

The discussions also covered another important document — the OTS Strategy for 2027–2031, which is expected to define the organization’s strategic framework and priority areas for the coming period.

In this context, the Ankara Summit may become an important milestone for the next stage of economic cooperation within the OTS.

The trend of recent years is increasingly clear. While the initial emphasis was largely on expanding trade volumes, economic relations are now becoming more closely linked to investment, transport infrastructure, financial institutions and digital technologies.

For Uzbekistan, the next task is to translate the existing $2.7 billion in additional export potential into actual trade, expand joint production chains with OTS countries, reduce transport costs and use new financial mechanisms to support private-sector projects.

Accordingly, the criteria for assessing economic integration within the OTS are also evolving. Trade turnover and investment volumes remain important indicators, but they are increasingly complemented by delivery times, logistics costs, industrial cooperation, joint projects, digital services and mobilized private capital.

It is this transition — from trade in goods toward an interconnected system of production, transport, finance and digital infrastructure — that increasingly defines the new economic substance of cooperation among the Turkic states.

Latofat Burieva

Center for Economic Research and Reforms

Today, the Consultative Meetings of the Heads of State of Central Asia provide the region’s leaders with a regular platform to align their positions on issues that shape the future of Central Asia as a whole. Over the course of eight summits, direct dialogue has evolved into sustained engagement at the level of national coordinators, relevant ministries and agencies, regions, and business communities. From an economic perspective, it is particularly important that trade, industry, transport, and investment are being addressed with due consideration for the interdependence of national development plans.

Central Asia has arrived at its current model of cooperation within a relatively short period of time. In 2017, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev proposed holding regular meetings of the region’s leaders, and the first such meeting took place in Astana in March 2018. The format was built around direct dialogue, allowing the states themselves to define the range of common issues and coordinate their positions in areas where results depend on the actions of neighboring countries. At the same time, the format has retained its fundamentally consultative nature, based on the independence of its participants.

As the scope of cooperation expanded, the necessary mechanisms were gradually established. In 2021, establishment of a Business Council was proposed. In 2022, the Treaty on Friendship, Good-Neighbourliness and Cooperation for the Development of Central Asia in the 21^st Century was signed. The Council of National Coordinators was established in 2023, and a year later the Central Asia 2040 Concept for the Development of Regional Cooperation was adopted. In this way, political dialogue acquired an institutional and legal framework between summits while preserving the flexibility of the original format.

Uzbekistan’s chairmanship in 2025 significantly strengthened sectoral cooperation. More than 20 major sectoral and interregional events were held, including the Interregional Cooperation Forum at the level of deputy prime ministers. Ahead of the Seventh Consultative Meeting in Tashkent, the first meeting of the Council of Ministers of Trade and Investment of the Central Asian countries and Azerbaijan was held. Discussions focused on practical objectives: increasing mutual trade to USD 20 billion, establishing production facilities under the “Made in Central Asia” brand, and attracting international financial institutions to infrastructure and industrial projects.

The current scale of economic ties makes it possible to pursue more ambitious objectives. By the end of 2025, Uzbekistan’s trade turnover with the Central Asian countries had reached USD 8.3 billion, an increase of 15.2 percent. In the same year, the volume of direct investment and loans attracted from countries in the region amounted to USD 1.3 billion. Growing trade and investment activity is creating a foundation for deeper industrial cooperation and the development of production chains among enterprises across the region.

This is the underlying rationale of “Made in Central Asia.” Enterprises from several countries can participate in the creation of a final product by distributing individual stages of production among themselves. For Uzbek businesses, such a model expands the pool of potential customers and enables production to be planned in response to demand beyond the domestic market. A practical foundation is already taking shape: an Action Plan for the Development of Industrial Cooperation for 2025–2027 has been approved, bilateral investment funds have been established, cross-border trade zones and industrial cooperation centers are being developed, and joint sectoral projects are being implemented.

The economics of production chains is directly dependent on logistics. The China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway, as well as the Trans-Afghan and Trans-Caspian routes, involve different groups of participating countries.

The consultative platform provides an opportunity to coordinate countries’ infrastructure plans, border crossing operations, and logistics hubs in advance. In 2025, Uzbekistan proposed establishing an Infrastructure Development Council at the level of deputy prime ministers in order to place such coordination on a permanent footing.

A more favorable business environment is also being shaped through decisions taken in bilateral and trilateral formats. Since 2023, citizens of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan have been able to cross the shared border using ID cards. In 2025, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan signed a treaty on the junction point of their state borders. These measures facilitate travel, business contacts, and cross-border trade.

Azerbaijan’s accession as a full-fledged participant in November 2025 expanded the permanent dialogue toward the South Caucasus and brought into the format a country located along the continuation of the Trans-Caspian routes. This makes it possible to address trade, transport, energy, and investment issues within a broader economic geography.

At the same time, the planning horizon is expanding. The Central Asia 2040 Concept established long-term priorities, while at the Tashkent summit Uzbekistan proposed developing a Comprehensive Regional Program for Trade and Economic Cooperation through 2035, adopting a Declaration on a Common Investment Space, and introducing a joint program for the development of e-commerce. For businesses, these initiatives create a more predictable horizon for planning investments, supply chains, and entry into neighboring markets.

Uzbekistan’s proposal to move toward a strategic “Central Asian Community” format also fits within this longer-term perspective, with the aim of strengthening continuity in the implementation of long-term infrastructure, industrial, and investment initiatives.

Following the conclusion of Uzbekistan’s chairmanship, the focus continued to shift toward new forms of economic connectivity. At the informal meeting of the heads of state of Central Asia and Azerbaijan in July 2026, Uzbekistan proposed substantive work on integrated industrial and technological value chains, shared digital services, and investment platforms.

The mechanisms developed in recent years make it possible to connect suppliers across several countries, establish production facilities serving broader markets, attract capital to projects of regional scale, and incorporate logistics considerations from the earliest stages of investment planning. The established channels of cooperation facilitate the transition from strategic priorities to concrete projects while preserving each state’s independence in decision-making. Translating high-level agreements into programs and measurable results is what defines the substance of the next stage.

For Uzbekistan, this represents a qualitatively new scale of regional economic policy. Central Asia is becoming a space where coordinated decisions expand the potential market for national enterprises, connect production capacities, open new routes, and strengthen the foundation for investment. This is precisely where the strategic significance of the platform lies: the countries of the region are themselves shaping the conditions for long-term growth, while Uzbekistan consistently advances initiatives that translate the potential of good-neighborly relations into tangible economic opportunities.